
The Nestorian Schism occured after the 3rd Ecumenical Council of Ephesus >condemned Nestorius for his views on a theological point
I'm in no position to judge the theological merits of the case, but to me, it seems more than a coincidence that the break occured along the lines it did.
ME 500s map QUESTION: Perhaps Nestorius actually spoke Greek better than Syriac, or made his arguments in Greek in the first place? Isn't this more of a "home town boy" issue (being born and educated in Antioch, Syriac speaking area(?)) than anything linguistic? ANSWER: certainly we aren't going to argue that geographical location of a person, whether mountain or meadow, has ought to do with which side of a theological debate someone is on. Perhaps, though, because the argument was made by a local hero, people ignored the debate, and simply sided with the home team. What percentage spoke Syriac, Pahlavi, Parthian or Greek, anyway? And here the relevant populations are Christian, rather than Zoroastrianism. What was literacy like? One argument against the hometown boy rule was that the citizens of Antioch did not prevent the Romans from closing out the school of Nestorius's teacher, Theodore of Mpsuestia. The school [School of Nisibis] moved eastward, to modern Iran, then the Sassanid Empire. It was politically advantageous for the Sassanids, as far as their antagonistic relations with the Eastern Roman Empire were concerned, to harbor the Nestorians. Not much of a counter-argument, I admit.
Comments or Questions about this page? Click here
Revision 138 as of 2008-02-07 20:07:32
© 2003-2009 by Josh Narins